Diffusion LM papers in 2026

Not an exhaustive catalog: these are core papers recorded in the public corpus. Paper counts do not measure quality or the importance of a method.

UTC: .

Core papers matching the current filters: 99.

By month and topic
MonthPapers
January0
February0
March0
April0
May21
June40
July18
August16
September4

Topics can overlap: a paper counts once in each of its topics, but only once in the total. A topic assignment does not prove quality or reproducibility.

Latest papers · Selection methodology

2026-06-28T06:31:36+00:00 · unclassified · Source

Understanding Evaluation Illusion in Diffusion Large Language Models

Despite the capability of parallel decoding, diffusion large language models (dLLMs) require many denoising steps to maintain generation quality, motivating recent research on efficient decoding strategies. However, existing studies have reported inconsistent evaluation results even under seemingly identical evaluation settings, risking biased conclusions about dLLM decoding methods. To understand this evaluation concern, we conduct a rigorous evaluation of current decoding methods for dLLMs across diverse evaluation settings. Surprisingly, our analysis reveals that the ranking of decoding met

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-28T05:53:45+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Inference acceleration, Post-training · Source

Multi-Block Diffusion Language Models

Block Diffusion Language Models (BD-LMs) improve diffusion-based text generation with KV caching and flexible-length generation. A natural next step is to extend them from Single-Block Diffusion (SingleBD) to Multi-Block Diffusion (MultiBD), where a running-set of consecutive blocks is decoded concurrently for inter-block parallelism. However, existing BD-LMs are mostly trained under teacher forcing, where the model observes only one noisy block conditioned on a clean prefix. While the recent diffusion forcing strategy introduces visibility among multiple noisy blocks, its training states stil

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-27T21:21:53+00:00 · Inference acceleration · Source

DiLaServe: High SLO Attainment Serving for Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion language models (DLMs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative to conventional autoregressive language models. By generating multiple tokens in parallel during each denoising step, they offer higher inference throughput while maintaining competitive quality. However, realizing these throughput gains while meeting latency SLOs in a serving system requires addressing challenges introduced by DLMs' unique characteristics. These include navigating the speed-quality tradeoff created by confidence-based denoising, choosing appropriate parallelization levels across model insta

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-22T16:32:25+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Post-training · Source

Scheduling Thoughts: Learning the Order of Thought in Diffusion Language Models

Masked diffusion language models decode by iteratively unmasking tokens, where the unmasking order defines an "order of thought" that strongly influences generation quality yet is typically chosen heuristically. We derive a tractable upper bound on the sequential decoding mismatch, measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence and expressed in terms of the model's pathwise log-likelihood, with tightness under sufficient model expressivity. This bound induces a dense self-aware reward over ordered trajectories, casting order selection as a principled policy optimization problem wit

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-19T23:49:42+00:00 · unclassified · Source

When to Plan, When to Polish: Noise Level as a Granularity Axis for Diffusion Language Models

Standard tokenwise diffusion LMs keep training corruption and inference commitment at token granularity throughout denoising. At high noise, this leaves scattered local fragments rather than coherent evidence, making it hard to form early coarse structure, exactly what planning-sensitive generation requires. Hierarchical planning methods add coarse stages to separate planning from wording, but they need extra planners, block latents, or two stage designs. We propose Noise Dependent Granularity Control (NDGC), a single-level diffusion method that uses the noise level as a granularity cue. NDGC

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T18:10:23+00:00 · Long context, Reasoning · Source

Diffusion Language Models: An Experimental Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language modeling through autoregressive generation, enabling strong performance across a wide range of tasks. Recently, Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as an alternative paradigm that generates text through iterative denoising rather than next-token prediction, allowing parallel refinement of entire sequences. While numerous diffusion-based architectures have been proposed, differences in evaluation protocols, datasets, inference budgets, and generation hyperparameters make it difficult to compare their capabilities and understand

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T18:10:23+00:00 · Long context, Reasoning · Source

Diffusion Language Models: An Experimental Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language modeling through autoregressive generation, enabling strong performance across a wide range of tasks. Recently, Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as an alternative paradigm that generates text through iterative denoising rather than next-token prediction, allowing parallel refinement of entire sequences. While numerous diffusion-based architectures have been proposed, differences in evaluation protocols, datasets, inference budgets, and generation hyperparameters make it difficult to compare their capabilities and understand

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T12:32:46+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Controllability · Source

Sumi: Open Uniform Diffusion Language Model from Scratch

Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models. Among these, uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) permit any token to be updated at any step, in principle enabling more flexible generation. However, no UDLM has yet been pretrained from scratch at both large parameter scale and large token budget. Both autoregressive modeling and masked diffusion modeling already have capable models at scale that the community can study and build on; uniform diffusion has none. A scratch-pretrained UDLM at scale would provide a clean reference point for studying scaling behav

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-16T14:46:53+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Code generation · Source

VoidPadding: Let [VOID] Handle Padding in Masked Diffusion Language Models so that [EOS] Can Focus on Semantic Termination

MDLMs generate text by denoising a preallocated masked response canvas, making response-length modeling central to instruction tuning. Existing MDLMs often inherit the autoregressive convention of using repeated \texttt{[EOS]} tokens for padding during instruction tuning, giving \texttt{[EOS]} a dual role as both a semantic terminator and a padding token. We show that this dual role is a root cause of \texttt{[EOS]} overflow under large-block decoding. To decouple these roles, we propose VoidPadding, which introduces \texttt{[VOID]} for padding and reserves \texttt{[EOS]} for termination. Duri

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-15T18:13:54+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Self-Generated Error Training for Token Editing in Diffusion Language Models

Token-to-token (T2T) editing lets LLaDA2.1 revise committed tokens during block-diffusion decoding. The released recipe trains this editor on random vocabulary corruptions, but at inference the editor sees the model's own fluent, high-confidence draft errors instead. We study this training-inference mismatch and propose self-generated T2T, which performs a no-gradient draft pass, fills masked positions with predicted tokens, and supervises recovery in a second pass under these self-generated corruptions. We implement the update as a short LoRA continued-pretraining pass on LLaDA2.1-mini a

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-15T16:15:45+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion · Source

LESS Is More: Mutual-Stability Sampling for Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer a promising alternative to autoregressive decoding by iteratively refining masked sequences, enabling parallel token updates and bidirectional conditioning. Their practical efficiency, however, is limited by sampling procedures that execute a fixed number of reverse denoising steps selected before decoding, spending computation on already-stable positions and sometimes committing unstable ones too early. We present \textsc{LESS}, a training-free, model-agnostic adaptive sampler that treats token commitment as an online stopping problem. \textsc{LES

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-15T06:39:31+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Who Should Lead Decoding Now? Tracking Reliable Trajectories for Ensembling Masked Diffusion Language Models

Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) have emerged as a distinct paradigm for sequence generation. As MDLMs become diverse in capabilities and knowledge coverage, an important question is how to combine their knowledge. Toward this, we first investigate the unique decoding dynamics of MDLMs. We find that successful generations exhibit stable confidence dynamics over answer-relevant positions, while unreliable trajectories can often be corrected by injecting promising intermediate states from other models. Guided by this observation, we propose $\textbf{TIE}$ ($\textbf{T}$rajectory-based $\t

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-14T13:17:58+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Mean-Field Parallel Decoding for Discrete Diffusion Language Models

Discrete diffusion language models enable parallel token generation, offering a pathway to low-latency decoding. However, selecting tokens independently by marginal confidence limits effective parallelism: tokens that appear reliable in isolation can form incompatible configurations when several positions are updated at once. We introduce a training-free decoding framework that coordinates these parallel updates. At each forward pass, the method assigns a commit score to each masked position and refines these scores using pairwise interactions derived from the model's predictive distribut

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-13T14:41:55+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion · Source

Semantic DLM+: Improving Diffusion Language Models through Bias-variance Trade-off in Transition Kernel Design

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have demonstrated strong scaling capacity as alternatives to autoregressive language models. However, their performance is highly sensitive to the choice of transition kernels, and poorly designed kernels can lead to issues like training instability, slow convergence, and biased sampling. In this paper, we study this sensitivity through a principled analysis of generalization error and identify three critical factors: asymptotic bias (difficulty in approximating the posterior distribution), exposure bias (error propagation during sampling), and optimization var

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-11T03:09:57+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion · Source

TimeROME-DLM: Temporal Causal Tracing and Low-Rank Inference-Time Knowledge Editing for Masked Diffusion Language Models

Masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) such as LLaDA now rival autoregressive (AR) LLMs, but every existing knowledge-editing and unlearning method (ROME, MEMIT, etc.) targets AR transformers and either makes assumptions that fail under iterative denoising, or requires gradient updates whose backward-pass activations cost tens of GB of extra VRAM and which collapse MDLMs at standard learning rates. We introduce TimeROME-DLM, the first training-free, gradient-free, inference-time knowledge-editing framework for MDLMs. It couples two components: a Temporal Indirect Effect (TIE) causal-tracing

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-10T16:14:23+00:00 · Reasoning, Post-training · Source

Beyond Fully Random Masking: Attention-Guided Denoising and Optimization for Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer an efficient alternative to autoregressive models through parallel decoding, yet existing post-training methods largely rely on random masking strategies that overlook intrinsic token dependencies. In this work, we present an empirical analysis of attention in dLLMs and show that tokens attending more strongly to unmasked context exhibit greater generation stability and play a critical role in reasoning. Motivated by these findings, we propose AGDO, an attention-guided denoising and optimization framework that aligns both training and optimization

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-10T15:41:26+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion · Source

Re-evaluating Confidence Remasking in Masked Diffusion Language Models

Masked diffusion language models (dLLMs) have recently emerged as a competitive alternative to autoregressive language models, with the promise of faster inference via parallel token generation. A notable limitation of the masked formulation, however, is that once a token has been unmasked it can no longer be revised, leaving dLLMs vulnerable to early sampling mistakes. To address this, a growing body of work has sought to extend masked dLLMs with self-correcting (remasking) capabilities. One appealing subset of these methods does so in a training-free, post-hoc manner based on token confidenc

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-09T13:17:27+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion · Source

Attention-Discounted Adaptive Sampler for Masked Diffusion Language Models

Masked diffusion language models can reduce inference steps by revealing multiple tokens per denoising iteration, but this parallelism is fragile: positions that are individually confident may be unsafe to commit together when their predictions are coupled. Existing training-free samplers such as Top-\(k\), Fast-dLLM, and EB-Sampler mainly control how many tokens to reveal, while often ranking candidates by token-wise scores that ignore interactions within the selected set. We propose ADAS, a training-free reranking rule for parallel masked diffusion decoding. ADAS leaves the base sampler'

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-09T08:06:22+00:00 · Inference acceleration, Long context · Source

Prefilling-dLLM: Predictive Prefilling for Long-Context Inference in Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) re-encode the entire prefix at every denoising step, causing recomputation that scales quadratically with context length and becomes prohibitive for long-context scenarios. We propose Prefilling-dLLM, a training-free prefill-decode disaggregation framework for dLLMs that partitions the prefix into N chunks, caches their KV representations once, and selects the top-K most relevant chunks with intra-chunk token sparsity for decoding, showing that sparse prefilling can outperform dense attention while reducing per-step complexity from quadratic in t

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-08T07:50:12+00:00 · unclassified · Source

Unified Energy for Invariant and Independent Decoding in Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) enable parallel text generation by iteratively denoising a full sequence, offering attractive flexibility compared to auto-regressive (AR) decoding. However, existing methods fail to fully capture token relationships, leading to a performance gap relative to AR baselines, especially as the degree of parallelism increases. In this paper, we give a systematic analysis of the gap, identifying three key factors: (i) model capacity, (ii) dependency, and (iii) invariance. To address these issues, we first propose an invariant energy (Inv-E) together with an effective

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

Previous

More

Public snapshot dates
Collection recorded in this snapshot
Newest publication recorded in this snapshot
Snapshot generated

These are saved observations, not the last collector attempt or a guarantee of corpus completeness.