Topics can overlap: a paper counts once in each of its topics, but only once in the total. A topic assignment does not prove quality or reproducibility.
Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) generate text via bidirectional iterative denoising, naturally supporting user-specified constraints anchored at arbitrary output positions, a paradigm known as In-place Prompting (IPP). We formalize this as the In-place Instruction Following (IIF) task and construct IIF-Bench, a hierarchical benchmark spanning literal, style, and discourse-function constraints, paired with a rubric-based local-global evaluation protocol. An inference-time attention-bias probe suggests that vanilla dLLMs often under-prioritize constraint spans during denoising. We then p
Useful for: The approach applies to diffusion large language models supporting user-specified constraints at arbitrary output positions. · Limitation: Vanilla dLLMs often under-prioritize constraint spans during denoising.
Autoregressive language models commit one token per forward pass; diffusion language models commit a block of tokens over several steps. We ask whether a block can be committed in a single forward pass. We study this with a noise-conditioned masked denoiser: a data-independent Gaussian noise field is added to the mask embeddings so that, in principle, each sampled field selects one joint mode of the block. The established way of training such a model is to sample several fields per example and let them compete for the data, by winner-take-all or importance weighting. This gives the noise only
Useful for: The method applies to one-step block generation with one forward pass per block. · Limitation: The source does not provide quantitative results or specify the tested model sizes.
Diffusion language models (DLMs) have emerged as a promising alternative to the auto-regressive paradigm. With bidirectional attention and any-order generation, DLMs naturally fit infilling tasks, which require generating a middle span conditioned on both the prefix and the suffix. However, infilling is sensitive to the length of the span, while DLMs require the length to be fixed before generation. Although prior studies extend DLMs to dynamic lengths, they still suffer from two limitations. (i) Sensitivity to initial length. These methods require a preset length to initialize the search and
Useful for: Infilling tasks for diffusion language models, including code and text benchmarks. · Limitation: The source does not provide detailed algorithmic implementation or per-benchmark results.
Diffusion language models (DLMs) have recently emerged as an alternative modeling paradigm to autoregressive LMs, offering advantages such as parallel generation and bidirectional context modeling. Despite growing interest in their generative capabilities, the privacy risks of DLMs remain underexplored. We identify a phenomenon termed token-level memorization asymmetry through theoretical analysis of diffusion training dynamics. Building on this finding, we propose Q-Skew, a quantile-weighted skewness-based indicator for membership inference on finetuned DLMs. Experiments across multiple fine-
Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed
Public snapshot dates
Collection recorded in this snapshot
Newest publication recorded in this snapshot
Snapshot generated
These are saved observations, not the last collector attempt or a guarantee of corpus completeness.