Diffusion LM papers in 2026

Not an exhaustive catalog: these are core papers recorded in the public corpus. Paper counts do not measure quality or the importance of a method.

UTC: .

Core papers matching the current filters: 17.

By month and topic
MonthPapers
January0
February0
March0
April0
May0
June17
July0
August0
September0

Topics can overlap: a paper counts once in each of its topics, but only once in the total. A topic assignment does not prove quality or reproducibility.

Latest papers · Selection methodology

2026-06-30T05:56:18+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Post-training · Source

TAG-DLM: Diffusion Language Models for Text-Attributed Graph Learning

Text-attributed graphs (TAGs), where each node carries a natural language description, require models to jointly reason over text and graph topology. Existing approaches often handle the two modalities separately: graph neural networks operate on shallow text features, while hybrids of LLMs and graphs use the language model mainly as a text encoder and delegate structure learning to a separate graph module. We propose method that unifies textual reasoning and graph message passing within a masked diffusion language model, a language model with bidirectional attention and generative decoding. F

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-22T16:32:25+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Post-training · Source

Scheduling Thoughts: Learning the Order of Thought in Diffusion Language Models

Masked diffusion language models decode by iteratively unmasking tokens, where the unmasking order defines an "order of thought" that strongly influences generation quality yet is typically chosen heuristically. We derive a tractable upper bound on the sequential decoding mismatch, measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence and expressed in terms of the model's pathwise log-likelihood, with tightness under sufficient model expressivity. This bound induces a dense self-aware reward over ordered trajectories, casting order selection as a principled policy optimization problem wit

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T18:10:23+00:00 · Long context, Reasoning · Source

Diffusion Language Models: An Experimental Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language modeling through autoregressive generation, enabling strong performance across a wide range of tasks. Recently, Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as an alternative paradigm that generates text through iterative denoising rather than next-token prediction, allowing parallel refinement of entire sequences. While numerous diffusion-based architectures have been proposed, differences in evaluation protocols, datasets, inference budgets, and generation hyperparameters make it difficult to compare their capabilities and understand

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T18:10:23+00:00 · Long context, Reasoning · Source

Diffusion Language Models: An Experimental Analysis

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized language modeling through autoregressive generation, enabling strong performance across a wide range of tasks. Recently, Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) have emerged as an alternative paradigm that generates text through iterative denoising rather than next-token prediction, allowing parallel refinement of entire sequences. While numerous diffusion-based architectures have been proposed, differences in evaluation protocols, datasets, inference budgets, and generation hyperparameters make it difficult to compare their capabilities and understand

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-17T12:32:46+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Controllability · Source

Sumi: Open Uniform Diffusion Language Model from Scratch

Diffusion models have become a promising alternative to autoregressive models. Among these, uniform diffusion language models (UDLMs) permit any token to be updated at any step, in principle enabling more flexible generation. However, no UDLM has yet been pretrained from scratch at both large parameter scale and large token budget. Both autoregressive modeling and masked diffusion modeling already have capable models at scale that the community can study and build on; uniform diffusion has none. A scratch-pretrained UDLM at scale would provide a clean reference point for studying scaling behav

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-16T14:46:53+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Code generation · Source

VoidPadding: Let [VOID] Handle Padding in Masked Diffusion Language Models so that [EOS] Can Focus on Semantic Termination

MDLMs generate text by denoising a preallocated masked response canvas, making response-length modeling central to instruction tuning. Existing MDLMs often inherit the autoregressive convention of using repeated \texttt{[EOS]} tokens for padding during instruction tuning, giving \texttt{[EOS]} a dual role as both a semantic terminator and a padding token. We show that this dual role is a root cause of \texttt{[EOS]} overflow under large-block decoding. To decouple these roles, we propose VoidPadding, which introduces \texttt{[VOID]} for padding and reserves \texttt{[EOS]} for termination. Duri

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-15T18:13:54+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Self-Generated Error Training for Token Editing in Diffusion Language Models

Token-to-token (T2T) editing lets LLaDA2.1 revise committed tokens during block-diffusion decoding. The released recipe trains this editor on random vocabulary corruptions, but at inference the editor sees the model's own fluent, high-confidence draft errors instead. We study this training-inference mismatch and propose self-generated T2T, which performs a no-gradient draft pass, fills masked positions with predicted tokens, and supervises recovery in a second pass under these self-generated corruptions. We implement the update as a short LoRA continued-pretraining pass on LLaDA2.1-mini a

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-15T06:39:31+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Who Should Lead Decoding Now? Tracking Reliable Trajectories for Ensembling Masked Diffusion Language Models

Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) have emerged as a distinct paradigm for sequence generation. As MDLMs become diverse in capabilities and knowledge coverage, an important question is how to combine their knowledge. Toward this, we first investigate the unique decoding dynamics of MDLMs. We find that successful generations exhibit stable confidence dynamics over answer-relevant positions, while unreliable trajectories can often be corrected by injecting promising intermediate states from other models. Guided by this observation, we propose $\textbf{TIE}$ ($\textbf{T}$rajectory-based $\t

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-14T13:17:58+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Mean-Field Parallel Decoding for Discrete Diffusion Language Models

Discrete diffusion language models enable parallel token generation, offering a pathway to low-latency decoding. However, selecting tokens independently by marginal confidence limits effective parallelism: tokens that appear reliable in isolation can form incompatible configurations when several positions are updated at once. We introduce a training-free decoding framework that coordinates these parallel updates. At each forward pass, the method assigns a commit score to each masked position and refines these scores using pairwise interactions derived from the model's predictive distribut

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-10T16:14:23+00:00 · Reasoning, Post-training · Source

Beyond Fully Random Masking: Attention-Guided Denoising and Optimization for Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer an efficient alternative to autoregressive models through parallel decoding, yet existing post-training methods largely rely on random masking strategies that overlook intrinsic token dependencies. In this work, we present an empirical analysis of attention in dLLMs and show that tokens attending more strongly to unmasked context exhibit greater generation stability and play a critical role in reasoning. Motivated by these findings, we propose AGDO, an attention-guided denoising and optimization framework that aligns both training and optimization

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-07T07:59:55+00:00 · Reasoning, Post-training · Source

Back on Track: Aligning Rewards and States for Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models

Reinforcement learning (RL) holds immense promise for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of diffusion large language models (dLLMs). However, progress is fundamentally constrained by a dual misalignment between authentic generation trajectory and the gradient update process: (i) Process-reward misalignment. Sparse, terminal rewards are indiscriminately assigned to all intermediate steps of the generation process, failing to provide discriminative credit assignment. (ii) State-trajectory misalignment. Policy updates are often diverted toward artificial, out-of-trajectory states, squandering g

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-07T02:24:11+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning, Code generation · Source

AsyncLane: Decoupling Refinement from Advancement in Diffusion Language Model Decoding

Block-wise semi-autoregressive decoding is the standard inference paradigm for diffusion large language models (DLMs), but it imposes a strict dependency between blocks: the next block cannot begin until the current block is fully decoded or its denoising budget is exhausted. We observe that once a block exposes a reliable delimiter boundary or stable semantic prefix, continuation generation need not wait for every residual token to be resolved. We propose AsyncLane, a training-free decoding scheduler that decouples refinement from advancement. AsyncLane forks a generate lane at observed delim

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-06T22:10:46+00:00 · Reasoning · Source

Forward-Free Diffusion Language Models

Diffusion language models generate text through iterative denoising, offering a powerful alternative to autoregressive generation. However, discrete language spaces lack a natural neighborhood structure for defining effective perturbations, so some artificial corruption schemes are proposed in the forward process. Such prescribed forward processes often produce states that are mathematically convenient but misaligned with drafts and errors encountered during generation, resulting in degraded sample quality. To address this limitation, we propose FReDA, a forward-free diffusion language model t

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-06T08:21:06+00:00 · Reasoning · Source

Diffusion Language Model Parallel Decoding via Product-of-Experts Bridge

Diffusion language models (DLMs) offer substantial speed advantages through parallel decoding, but the lack of token dependencies limits generation quality compared to autoregressive (AR) models. Recent progress attempts to bridge the gap via importance sampling, with DLM being the proposal and AR being the target. However, due to the huge gap between their distributions, the sampling requires a large number of particles and is thus expensive to compute. In this paper, we introduce PoE-Bridge, a novel decoding framework that drastically improves generation speed and accuracy by introducing an

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-04T17:56:27+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Self-Augmenting Retrieval for Diffusion Language Models

Discrete diffusion language models generate text by iteratively denoising an entire response in parallel. At each step, they predict tentative tokens for every masked position, committing the confident predictions to the output and discarding the unconfident ones. We show that the discarded tokens are in fact a useful lookahead signal for retrieval-augmented generation: even low-confidence tokens often surface salient entities early in the denoising trajectory, enabling retrieval of stronger evidence before the output is finalized. We exploit this through Self-Augmenting Retrieval for Diffusio

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-03T07:18:23+00:00 · Reasoning, Controllability · Source

Dynamic Infilling Anchors for Format-Constrained Generation in Diffusion Large Language Models

Diffusion large language models (dLLMs) offer bidirectional attention and parallel generation, enabling them to exploit global context and naturally support format-constrained tasks like parseable JSON or reasoning templates. While straightforward fixed anchors can enforce such constraints, they often impose rigid spans, leading to truncated reasoning or redundant content. To overcome this, we propose Dynamic Infilling Anchors (DIA), a training-free method that dynamically estimates end-anchor positions to adjust generation length before iterative infilling. This flexible mechanism ensures str

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

2026-06-02T21:35:54+00:00 · Masked / discrete diffusion, Reasoning · Source

Supportive Token Revealing for Fast Diffusion Language Model Decoding

Discrete diffusion language models can generate text efficiently by updating multiple masked positions in parallel, but this parallelism introduces a quality-latency trade-off. Aggressive decoding may commit mutually dependent tokens too early, while conservative decoding requires many denoising steps. Existing methods address this tension by deciding which tokens are safe to reveal using confidence or dependency criteria. However, avoiding unsafe commits does not necessarily make the remaining masked sequence easy to decode, since uncertain tokens may depend on masked tokens, creating a bottl

Useful for: Not assessed · Limitation: Not assessed

Public snapshot dates
Collection recorded in this snapshot
Newest publication recorded in this snapshot
Snapshot generated

These are saved observations, not the last collector attempt or a guarantee of corpus completeness.